top | item 44621389

(no title)

shitlord | 7 months ago

I don't think the union is corrupt. The union's job is to advocate for its members. The legislators' job is to say "no, you're asking for too much".

discuss

order

gruez|7 months ago

Now try this with corporations:

"I don't think the company[1] is corrupt. The company's job is to advocate for its shareholders. The legislators' job is to say "no, you're asking for too much"."

[1] take your pick of Comcast, Boeing, or United Health

pclmulqdq|7 months ago

You're right. The real problem is that the MTA union is a big voting and donation bloc that selects the people they negotiate against. The real solution is to do away with the MTA union. An organization founded on corruption doing its intended purpose isn't any less corrupt.

Ericson2314|7 months ago

It would be nice if the union found ways to advocate for its members that were less hostile to the well functioning of the MTA.

Unfortunately, I think the hostility here is very much part of the point. It's an expression of power.

Other countries' unions are much more open minded about automation.

const_cast|7 months ago

> Other countries' unions are much more open minded about automation.

Other countries have social services outside of "fuck you, go die".

The US sucks major ass to be a working person, period. Your job is everything. If you lose your job, you can lose it all. Most people are one or two bad weeks away from being homeless here.

Yes, the stakes are higher. My job isn't just a job - it's my health insurance, it's the roof over my head, it's the food on my table, it's my reputation.

Want people to be less hostile to automation? Great, start by making automation less hostile to them. When automation threatens your actual life, people are going to oppose it. At the end of the day, we're animals. When a Gazelle sees a Lion, they run.