(no title)
bantunes | 7 months ago
And the only way we can have it differently is with violence, which nobody wants. So we'll walk to the abyss together.
bantunes | 7 months ago
And the only way we can have it differently is with violence, which nobody wants. So we'll walk to the abyss together.
scottLobster|7 months ago
And yet I, with my already depressed wages and kids to feed, should sacrifice steak and coach airline tickets?
I'm all for climate action, but it has to be policy level. If it's a choice between a warming world where we're solvent with some middle class prosperity, and a warming world where my wife, kids and I are broke because we went into six figures of debt replacing our ICE cars with EVs and retrofitting my house to passivhaus stanadards, I'm taking the former.
yongjik|7 months ago
And then we can use the money for EV credits, more wind farms, and other initiatives. Hell, if you're really against climate policies, we could simply burn the money and at least that could help fighting inflation.
There is one party in the US that constantly shoots down climate policies. Guess what they also do to Jeff Bezos's tax. Somehow that doesn't bother all those "climate policy skeptics" that are deeply upset about his private jet.
triceratops|7 months ago
Policy level climate action is the only kind that has any hope of succeeding. That or some magic technology that can suck carbon out of the air at zero cost.
dmbche|7 months ago
intended|7 months ago
If there is a structural force shifting the market places of ideas and decisions, forcing certain choices or protecting and harvesting voting blocs - it’s not “we” in the sense of personal choice.
I concede, that if we define corporations as an expression of human desires - then yes, “we” have made that decision.
Earw0rm|7 months ago
"The rich declare themselves poor" - George Michael, Praying For Time, 1990.