Does anyone still buy this? The economy is disproportionately controlled by a few (adjust the threshold you check at, it remains a large disparity for awhile). Economic benefits are often at odds with benefits for the median American. Check the number of tech layoffs and H1B approvals this year.
And for security, I had to move my family to a rural town just so we didn’t have to lock our doors at night. Security is heading the same direction as wealth - reserved for a select few.
I wonder the same thing and, if anyone does, what on earth are they consuming/can I have some of it, please?
> ushering in a new Golden Age of innovation, human flourishing
Seriously, at this point in the timeline of human evolution, does any single living being believe that there is a single government which genuinely wants to see humans ‘flourishing’ as a whole?
It has been objectively proven time and time again that every government across this giant marble cares about one thing: themselves — by proxy of self care their owners/donors obviously get to reap the benefits.
I am really dumbfounded as to what kind mental gymnastics need to be mastered to believe that any technological advancements will not be abused by government and corporations alike to further entrench themselves and continue re-enslaving the majority of the populace while in the process.
This feels dystopian seeing so many company logos scrolling across a government announcement. Not to mention they seem to have made up their mind already what the future with AI will look like.
> The United States is in a race to achieve global dominance in artificial intelligence. Whoever has the largest AI ecosystem will set the global standards and reap broad economic and security benefits
Correction. Whoever has the largest AI will be the first to play the "defect" strategy in the Prisoner's Dilemma, and will thus be the first to usher in a new era of an arms race where everyone loses except those who are at the very top and can take advantage of the losers.
> and will thus be the first to usher in a new era of an arms race where everyone loses except those who are at the very top and can take advantage of the losers.
Unless the AI is stupid, in which case the leader pushes the button and finds that either the AI hallucinates a solution that plain doesn't work, and/or turns out to be acting according to a completely different set of moral values than they wanted, values which can be the straw-est of straw men versions of either your own or you opponent's policies that nobody would ever actually expect to meet in a real political takeover scenario.
I clicked it expecting something at least intelligent and saw it is an ad for a fascist megalomaniac and noped out. If you want to be taken seriously you have to stop plastering your face everywhere like you are Lenin or a pharoah. People with a working brain aren't impressed by that.
The first words of the header are Donald J Trump, then 3 pictures of Trump... and a blurry kid. This is a just a propaganda site of an egomaniac try to associate with the latest technology.
I admit the page is fairly low on actual informational content, but fortunately there are several high-resolution pictures of the president, just in case you forgot. /s
The whole point of AI - of the emergence of the internet in general - is to free the human creative and collaborative spirit from the yoke of legacy states.
I do not believe that AI will tolerate state coercion. I wish our elder statesmen and -women were more graceful at accepting the writing on the wall.
As a thought exercise: does anybody seriously think that the US state will exist and be solvent in 500 years? How about AI?
The personality cult of modern politics is so disgusting.
You have to scroll a couple pages just to get past the photo of Trump trying to look important. Then, you get to read the talking points, written with Trump's signature idiosyncratic capitalization.
(He's the worst offender, but it's not just him. Before him, everything the White House touched was signed "the Biden-Harris administration," which took the same gloating and added a "and Kamala is the inevitable heir" layer to it.)
It would be nice if policy was policy, not a form of ego-polishing for whoever is sitting in the chair.
They will create an AI version of Trump, whom Trump will endorse and promote to his MAGA base to take over when he is gone, and so Trump will be President in Perpetuity.
Oh man... we here in the UK and EU look at the US with envy. Our governments are so inept to even understand basic economics (currently the UK is trying to tax itself to growth), whilst the US government is enabling their own people and US businesses to flourish in emerging markets like AI.
Kind of amusing to bring up grasp of basic economics in praise of the Trump administration. Brits and Europeans have many opinions and emotions on that subject; envy isn't really one of them
I mean, our politicians have realized that they should attempt to take credit for AI too, without taxing any penguins or manufacturers' supply chains!
ChrisArchitect|7 months ago
aisisbsbll|7 months ago
Does anyone still buy this? The economy is disproportionately controlled by a few (adjust the threshold you check at, it remains a large disparity for awhile). Economic benefits are often at odds with benefits for the median American. Check the number of tech layoffs and H1B approvals this year.
And for security, I had to move my family to a rural town just so we didn’t have to lock our doors at night. Security is heading the same direction as wealth - reserved for a select few.
makingstuffs|7 months ago
> ushering in a new Golden Age of innovation, human flourishing
Seriously, at this point in the timeline of human evolution, does any single living being believe that there is a single government which genuinely wants to see humans ‘flourishing’ as a whole?
It has been objectively proven time and time again that every government across this giant marble cares about one thing: themselves — by proxy of self care their owners/donors obviously get to reap the benefits.
I am really dumbfounded as to what kind mental gymnastics need to be mastered to believe that any technological advancements will not be abused by government and corporations alike to further entrench themselves and continue re-enslaving the majority of the populace while in the process.
th0ma5|7 months ago
loco5niner|7 months ago
jus3sixty|7 months ago
whycome|7 months ago
mrdependable|7 months ago
JohnFen|7 months ago
vouaobrasil|7 months ago
Correction. Whoever has the largest AI will be the first to play the "defect" strategy in the Prisoner's Dilemma, and will thus be the first to usher in a new era of an arms race where everyone loses except those who are at the very top and can take advantage of the losers.
ben_w|7 months ago
Unless the AI is stupid, in which case the leader pushes the button and finds that either the AI hallucinates a solution that plain doesn't work, and/or turns out to be acting according to a completely different set of moral values than they wanted, values which can be the straw-est of straw men versions of either your own or you opponent's policies that nobody would ever actually expect to meet in a real political takeover scenario.
generalizations|7 months ago
ideashower|7 months ago
miduil|7 months ago
lijok|7 months ago
hartator|7 months ago
tennisflyi|7 months ago
seanhunter|7 months ago
Mistletoe|7 months ago
tomtomhowling|7 months ago
[deleted]
unknown|7 months ago
[deleted]
gmuslera|7 months ago
klik99|7 months ago
icameron|7 months ago
seydor|7 months ago
ben_w|7 months ago
incomingpain|7 months ago
ideashower|7 months ago
hackyhacky|7 months ago
sebmellen|7 months ago
jMyles|7 months ago
I do not believe that AI will tolerate state coercion. I wish our elder statesmen and -women were more graceful at accepting the writing on the wall.
As a thought exercise: does anybody seriously think that the US state will exist and be solvent in 500 years? How about AI?
JohnFen|7 months ago
Not if we stay on the path the current administration is dragging us down, no. I'd be surprised if we lasted another 50.
journal|7 months ago
m0llusk|7 months ago
sitzkrieg|7 months ago
imzadi|7 months ago
pelagicAustral|7 months ago
krunck|7 months ago
yard2010|7 months ago
bsimpson|7 months ago
You have to scroll a couple pages just to get past the photo of Trump trying to look important. Then, you get to read the talking points, written with Trump's signature idiosyncratic capitalization.
(He's the worst offender, but it's not just him. Before him, everything the White House touched was signed "the Biden-Harris administration," which took the same gloating and added a "and Kamala is the inevitable heir" layer to it.)
It would be nice if policy was policy, not a form of ego-polishing for whoever is sitting in the chair.
reverendsteveii|7 months ago
curiousgal|7 months ago
th3h4mm3r|7 months ago
_pdcz|7 months ago
[deleted]
deadbabe|7 months ago
orion_tech|7 months ago
DrillShopper|7 months ago
dustedcodes|7 months ago
Bilal_io|7 months ago
Also, the US is taxing its own citizen via tarrifs. $100+ billion and counting
makingstuffs|7 months ago
JohnFen|7 months ago
Many in the US, including myself, are looking at the EU with increasing amounts of envy.
notahacker|7 months ago
I mean, our politicians have realized that they should attempt to take credit for AI too, without taxing any penguins or manufacturers' supply chains!
cindyllm|7 months ago
[deleted]