(no title)
bognition | 7 months ago
The aqueducts were also responsible for Romes ability to proliferate and grow. Lead was both a blessing and a curse.
I wonder what future generations will say about our highly enriched and processed diets. Calories have never been cheaper and food is ubiquitous. However I believe our food is playing a huge role in our degraded health.
It’s not surprising that most studies looking at the consumption of unprocessed food, fresh fruit and vegetables show benefits to our health.
The challenge is how do we get this food in the hands of those who need it cheaply and without sacrificing the nutritional (and microbial) content.
papercrane|7 months ago
declan_roberts|7 months ago
Headline science has a way of sticking around for a long time.
didgeoridoo|7 months ago
buovjaga|7 months ago
edwardbernays|7 months ago
dathinab|7 months ago
lead tastes sweet, sugar wasn't cheaply & widely available, honey is expensive etc.
and knowledge about lead poisoning was not really a think AFIK
at the same time lead pipes tend to gain a crust of chalk over time (depending on chalk content of the water) which mostly defuses their danger. Like you will find some very old houses with lead tape water pipes in the EU today but if you test their tape water you won't find (much of) an issue due to 1) the chalk 2) the water not staying long in the pipe if it's e.g. a 4 apartment house.
bayindirh|7 months ago
[0]: https://www.brookings.edu/articles/new-evidence-that-lead-ex...
adastra22|7 months ago
boston_clone|7 months ago
Public health experts contend that enriched foods have improved baseline quality of life. Wheat breads with iron, folate, and B vitamins in the US is an easy example.
JumpCrisscross|7 months ago
Getting nutrients from whole foods is generally superior, for absorption and balance and avoiding overdosing, than getting it from supplements, whether taken directly or via enrichment.
That said, getting a nutrient any way is better than running a deficiency. For most of agricultural human history, in most societies, most of the population was nutritionally sufficient [1]. That changed with enrichment. It’s healthier to eat whole over enriched food; it’s better to have enriched food versus a vitamin decency.
It’s ahistoric to claim we’re unhealthier today than we’ve been over most of human history. But we can do better. In that way, Roman pipes brought clean water to its populations in a way that made them healthier than people had been in cities to date. But it also gave them lead poisoning, which while better than cholera, is worse than no lead.
[1] https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9460423/
slumberlust|7 months ago
cpursley|7 months ago
Hint: it's the farm-bill dependent carb farmers who apparently need our money via farm subsidies and want poor people hooked as they get it from the other end in the form of SNAP.
Etheryte|7 months ago
SapporoChris|7 months ago
bigmattystyles|7 months ago
bongodongobob|7 months ago
giantg2|7 months ago
I highly doubt there was much effect from the pipes. They would quickly be sealed in mineral scale. Cups or utensils - maybe, but would be more about specific important people using them rather than being widespread.
MengerSponge|7 months ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lead(II)_acetate
underlipton|7 months ago
As to your last question, part of it may be rethinking the profit motive in food production. Food waste to keep prices high is a huge issue.
throawaywpg|7 months ago
tim333|7 months ago
kmeisthax|7 months ago
Also, the Roman Empire didn't fall, either. It split in two. The Western half continued splitting into a bunch of competing kingdoms while the Eastern half slowly shrank over about a thousand years. It eventually wound up being rolled into the Ottoman Empire, which lasted until WWI.