(no title)
timje1
|
7 months ago
It's literally just sticking the MPs name into an AI and asking for it to generate a mock ID for them. None of their real data is being used (e.g. their face, their DoB, the address) and the mock IDs wouldn't fool anyone for a second. I'd love if someone who understands the law would weigh in though
NicuCalcea|7 months ago
marcus_holmes|7 months ago
We hold that LLMs are incapable of generating copyrighted images, so it's not just a tool - if it was just a tool then the author would be able to copyright the images. The courts recognise that an LLM is capable of generating things in its own right (which is why they're not copyrightable - copyrights only protect human works).
So it follows that an LLM must be able to create images itself, separate from the human prompter.
Whether that's enough to absolve the human of the crime, though - IANAL, and I suspect it would take the House of Lords to rule on it definitively.
zmmmmm|7 months ago
gus_massa|7 months ago
OJFord|7 months ago
There isn't one.
dotancohen|7 months ago
unknown|7 months ago
[deleted]
aembleton|7 months ago
John7878781|7 months ago
jrockway|7 months ago
brookst|7 months ago