top | item 44747604 (no title) mckravchyk | 7 months ago C++ does not have a function keyword at all, I wonder why did they add it in the first place. discuss order hn newest Tuna-Fish|7 months ago The c++ notation for functions (and types in general) is horrible, and makes parsing much more expensive than it needs to be. Fixing it is step one if you are making a modern language. pjmlp|7 months ago A compatibility required by C. twoodfin|7 months ago To avoid any possibility of reintroducing the Most Vexing Parse?https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Most_vexing_parse gpderetta|7 months ago It doesn't, but you can pretend it does: auto my_function(int, double) -> int; They probably want to use the same arrow signature and need something in place of auto as omitting it completely would complicate parsing.
Tuna-Fish|7 months ago The c++ notation for functions (and types in general) is horrible, and makes parsing much more expensive than it needs to be. Fixing it is step one if you are making a modern language. pjmlp|7 months ago A compatibility required by C.
twoodfin|7 months ago To avoid any possibility of reintroducing the Most Vexing Parse?https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Most_vexing_parse
gpderetta|7 months ago It doesn't, but you can pretend it does: auto my_function(int, double) -> int; They probably want to use the same arrow signature and need something in place of auto as omitting it completely would complicate parsing.
Tuna-Fish|7 months ago
pjmlp|7 months ago
twoodfin|7 months ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Most_vexing_parse
gpderetta|7 months ago