[jjjutla]

The confidence score is calculated by two factors: whether the function call chain represents a valid code path (programmatic correctness) and how well it aligns with the defined threat model for what it thinks is a security vulnerability. False positives usually occur from incorrect assumptions about context, for example, flagging endpoints as missing authentication when such behaviour is actually intended.

Was this an incorrect code path or an incorrect understanding of a security issue?

This is why we focus heavily on threat modelling and defining the security and business invariants that must hold. From a code level, the only context we can infer is through developer intent and data flow analysis.

Something we are working on is custom rules and allowing a user to add context when starting a scan to improve alignment and reduces false positives.

[bearsyankees]

The security issue and POCs provided were not real like they said there was a vuln but I double checked it and it was not an exploitable vuln