[Paul-Craft]

> Live interviews are generally excellent at revealing how individuals perform when placed outside their comfort zone.

I suppose if by "outside their comfort zone," you mean in a potentially literal life or death situation (because, face it, most people can't live long without a job in the US), under an arbitrary and very short deadline, possibly using unfamiliar tools, and simultaneously having to explain every little thing they do, then yes, I would agree with this. I don't believe the sentence after this follows logically from it, though.

[nabla9]

No. More like the ability to be around new people, have their work evaluated, getting frank feedback, being honest about their mistakes, defending their positions.

If interview feels like life and death, maybe you are not the right hire.

[Paul-Craft]

Interviews are not valid tests of those things due to the stress involved.

If you don't understand how not having a job in a place like the US is life or death, you're not the right interviewer.