[thelittlenag]

My comment here is a very narrow one. In general I agree with your sentiment and thoughts, so please don't misread me. There is one nit I need to pick, however.

There is a subtle, but worthwhile, difference between "plausible" and "credible". Lots of stories are plausible. Few are credible.

In emotion laden cases like this we tend to want to believe stories we already agree with, or have some investment in. I'm no exception to that.

We need to not be misled by what is plausible, or confuse that with what is credible.

[ryanackley]

Very interesting point. You're right there is a difference and the difference is subtle. I agree with what you're implying: the accusers stories are plausible. Credibility requires more information.