[nabwodahs]

"NPR Has Zero Republicans, 87 Democrats on Editorial Staff"

How many "Republicans" applied?

[autoexec]

I guess they expect NPR to have diversity hires to meet republican quotas now?

[lenkite]

Of-course, I am sure a government funded 100%-republican news and broadcasting agency with news pieces spouting right-wing talking points trotted out with regularity would be fully accepted as an excellent use of taxpayer money in the public interest by democratic politicians.

[smithkl42]

Undoubtedly that's the reason for the under-representation of women as Fortune 500 CEO's. They're just not applying.

[const_cast]

The difference is that being a republican is an ideology you choose. Republicans can stop being republicans at any time - but they don't, they continue, because they enjoy being republican.

What I mean is, republicans choose to be ideologically opposed to journalism and ideologically opposed to education. Why would they become journalists? They hate journalism, by choice.

[nabwodahs]

Would applying be a personal and professional liability for women, the way doing so at NPR could very well be for a "Republican?"

How many "Republicans" apply for jobs in gay bars?

Nice false-equivalency attempt.