We launched Kled 6 weeks ago as a data marketplace for everyday people. Users upload personal content like camera rolls, dashcam footage, homework, POV recordings, and original music, and we pay them for it.
While AI companies scrape public data to train their models, we’re building a platform that compensates users and gives AI labs access to licensed, high-quality data.
The product took off quickly. We did over 20 million impressions on Twitter, more than 10,000 people signed up, petabytes of data were uploaded, and we’ve paid out over $300,000 to users.
Every file uploaded is automatically classified and made searchable so AI companies can instantly license the exact datasets they need.
Over the next five weeks, we’re doubling down on our labeling operations and hiring top AI engineers. We’ve raised over $2 million in venture capital at a $40 million valuation. High pay and high equity. Email avi@kled.ai
No one cares about the aggregated sum you spent, and something tells me that instead of directly saying how much the average user was paid, the PR team chose to divulge the total amount because it sounds better (someone must have pat themselves on the back when they phrased it as "we paid users $300K").
It's a reasonable idea. Certainly it makes sense that AI companies need training data and people should have a way to sell that data to them. That said, given that the government seems to be moving in a "copyright does not apply to AI" direction, I would not want to putting my eggs in an "AI companies will pay for data" basket.
Private repositories of data will still be valuable due to AI content making public content not suitable for training purposes; but if copyright doesn’t apply the real issue is identifying the content, not paying for it; paying for it might be worse as you’re creating an incentive to upload junk data.
They are actively paying for it now, and regulation is moving in that direction as well. Regardless, someone's camera roll data, for example, isn't publicly available, meaning it can be sold, unlike someone's Instagram photos.
It's funny I had a similar idea but with dashcams, for the automotive industry. You could pay people to install additional cameras to there cars and pay them by the miles driven. I'm sure car manufacturers would love this training data.
alexcroox|7 months ago
Avipat_|7 months ago
While AI companies scrape public data to train their models, we’re building a platform that compensates users and gives AI labs access to licensed, high-quality data.
The product took off quickly. We did over 20 million impressions on Twitter, more than 10,000 people signed up, petabytes of data were uploaded, and we’ve paid out over $300,000 to users.
Every file uploaded is automatically classified and made searchable so AI companies can instantly license the exact datasets they need.
Over the next five weeks, we’re doubling down on our labeling operations and hiring top AI engineers. We’ve raised over $2 million in venture capital at a $40 million valuation. High pay and high equity. Email avi@kled.ai
lampiaio|7 months ago
minimaxir|7 months ago
codingdave|7 months ago
unknown|7 months ago
[deleted]
amelius|7 months ago
Sorry, but wtf?!?
CobrastanJorji|7 months ago
lurk2|7 months ago
Avipat_|7 months ago
slowmotarget|7 months ago
Avipat_|7 months ago
lurk2|7 months ago
Backed how? Are these companies endorsing your product? Are they customers? Do you have employees who worked for them?