While agents act on behalf of the user, they won't see nor click any ads; they won't sign-up to any newsletter; they won't buy the website owner a coffee. They don't act as humans just because humans triggered them. They simply take what they need and walk away.
1gn15|6 months ago
Rebelgecko|6 months ago
beardyw|6 months ago
Without advertising the web would be largely unsupportable financially without per site subscriptions.
Tokumei-no-hito|6 months ago
where's the front page CF callout for google search agent? they wouldn't dare. i don't remember the shaming for ad and newsletter pop up blockers.
that being said, agree with you that sites are not being used the way they were intended. i think this is part of the evolution of the web. it all began with no monetization, then swung far too much into it to the point of abuse. and now legitimate content creators are stuck in the middle.
what i disagree on is that CF has the right to, again allegedly, shame perplexity on false information. especially when OAI is solving captchas and google is also "misusing" websites.
i wish i had an answer to how we can evolve the web sustainably. my main gripe is the shaming and virtue signaling.
skybrian|6 months ago
skeledrew|6 months ago
skybrian|6 months ago
vouaobrasil|6 months ago
lofaszvanitt|6 months ago