top | item 44797837 (no title) kentrado | 6 months ago I don't well understand this. How is clojure more efficient than common lisp?Would you explain further? discuss order hn newest netbioserror|6 months ago From a compute standpoint I guess I'm wrong. But from a modeling power perspective, I definitely prefer the clarity and uniformity of Clojure's standard library functions. Maybe that has something to do with its distinct data types, maybe not. rscho|6 months ago What do you mean with 'distinct data types' ? Most lisps are strongly typed. SBCL even accepts type declarations. load replies (1)
netbioserror|6 months ago From a compute standpoint I guess I'm wrong. But from a modeling power perspective, I definitely prefer the clarity and uniformity of Clojure's standard library functions. Maybe that has something to do with its distinct data types, maybe not. rscho|6 months ago What do you mean with 'distinct data types' ? Most lisps are strongly typed. SBCL even accepts type declarations. load replies (1)
rscho|6 months ago What do you mean with 'distinct data types' ? Most lisps are strongly typed. SBCL even accepts type declarations. load replies (1)
netbioserror|6 months ago
rscho|6 months ago