top | item 44800835

(no title)

snewman | 6 months ago

No, because there are lots of things people can do that it still can't do.

discuss

order

sdenton4|6 months ago

"If it is still possible to put a goalpost somewhere - and we don't care where - then it's not AGI."

dns_snek|6 months ago

LLMs are what they are, calling them "AGI" won't make them any more useful or exciting than they are, it's just going to devalue the term "AGI" which has revolutionary, disease-curing, humanity-saving connotations. What are you looking for us to say exactly?

1. We aren't even close to AGI and it's unclear that we'll ever get there, but it would change the course of humanity in a significant way if we ever do.

2. Wow we've reached AGI but now I'm realizing that AGI is lame, we need a new term for the humanity-saving sales pitch that we were promised!