top | item 44803029 (no title) superjan | 6 months ago Arithmetic coding decodes 1 bit at a time, usually in such a way that you can’t do two bits or more with SIMD instructions. So it will be slow and energy inefficient. discuss order hn newest astrange|6 months ago Deompression is limited by memory bandwidth IME, which means that more efficient compression is (almost) always more power-efficient too.(I don't have numbers for this, but it was generally agreed by the x264 team at one point.) adgjlsfhk1|6 months ago this isn't necessarily true. zstd uses an ans which is a type of arithmetic coding which is very efficient to decode superjan|6 months ago Nice to learn about. It’s good to know the field has progressed, however the context focused on JPEG, where my point does apply.
astrange|6 months ago Deompression is limited by memory bandwidth IME, which means that more efficient compression is (almost) always more power-efficient too.(I don't have numbers for this, but it was generally agreed by the x264 team at one point.)
adgjlsfhk1|6 months ago this isn't necessarily true. zstd uses an ans which is a type of arithmetic coding which is very efficient to decode superjan|6 months ago Nice to learn about. It’s good to know the field has progressed, however the context focused on JPEG, where my point does apply.
superjan|6 months ago Nice to learn about. It’s good to know the field has progressed, however the context focused on JPEG, where my point does apply.
astrange|6 months ago
(I don't have numbers for this, but it was generally agreed by the x264 team at one point.)
adgjlsfhk1|6 months ago
superjan|6 months ago