top | item 44803059 (no title) achempion | 6 months ago Why would they buy exactly 49% and not 51% of Intel? If these extra 2% are not available, why buy 49% then and not just 2-5%? discuss order hn newest bathtub365|6 months ago They don’t want a successful foreign company to have a controlling interest in their failing domestic company tremon|6 months ago Is your "they" the same as the parent's "they"? Seems like you're talking about different parties. seanmcdirmid|6 months ago They want to ensure that TSMC doesn't have a controlling stake. sct202|6 months ago The remaining 51% would be highly fractured unless it was like the US government on the otherside. One of the publicly traded companies I worked at effectively got taken over with <20% of regular shares by an activist billionaire. load replies (2)
bathtub365|6 months ago They don’t want a successful foreign company to have a controlling interest in their failing domestic company tremon|6 months ago Is your "they" the same as the parent's "they"? Seems like you're talking about different parties.
tremon|6 months ago Is your "they" the same as the parent's "they"? Seems like you're talking about different parties.
seanmcdirmid|6 months ago They want to ensure that TSMC doesn't have a controlling stake. sct202|6 months ago The remaining 51% would be highly fractured unless it was like the US government on the otherside. One of the publicly traded companies I worked at effectively got taken over with <20% of regular shares by an activist billionaire. load replies (2)
sct202|6 months ago The remaining 51% would be highly fractured unless it was like the US government on the otherside. One of the publicly traded companies I worked at effectively got taken over with <20% of regular shares by an activist billionaire. load replies (2)
bathtub365|6 months ago
tremon|6 months ago
seanmcdirmid|6 months ago
sct202|6 months ago