top | item 44831399 (no title) chilmers | 6 months ago That one is so obviously wrong that it makes me wonder if someone mislabelled the chart, but perhaps I'm being too optimistic. discuss order hn newest computomatic|6 months ago Presumably it corresponds to Table 8 from this doc: https://cdn.openai.com/pdf/8124a3ce-ab78-4f06-96eb-49ea29ffb...If that’s the case, it’s mislabelled and should have read “17%” which would better the visual. eviks|6 months ago That would still be basic fail, you don't label a chart, you enter data, the pre-AGI computer program does the rest - draws the bars and slows labels that match the data mwigdahl|6 months ago It's been fixed on the OpenAI website.
computomatic|6 months ago Presumably it corresponds to Table 8 from this doc: https://cdn.openai.com/pdf/8124a3ce-ab78-4f06-96eb-49ea29ffb...If that’s the case, it’s mislabelled and should have read “17%” which would better the visual.
eviks|6 months ago That would still be basic fail, you don't label a chart, you enter data, the pre-AGI computer program does the rest - draws the bars and slows labels that match the data
computomatic|6 months ago
If that’s the case, it’s mislabelled and should have read “17%” which would better the visual.
eviks|6 months ago
mwigdahl|6 months ago