Using the formula for black hole density, a black hole of this mass would have an average density about the same as the near-vacuum atmosphere of Mars(!)
Which isn't surprising if you think about it. Imagine the whole nothingness of the solar system being filled with even that density of gas. That's a metric ton of gas.
This reminds me of when I was a physics undergrad way back in the mid 80s. We used to spend nights drinking beer and hacking some simulations from the Computer Recreations section of Scientific American.
Once we wanted to simulate the dynamics of galaxies. I don'it think it was an SA article, but we did it the slow way by calculating the force on every star individually from each other star. It was excruciatingly slow and boring.
Then some time later, I don't recall where I picked that up, I updated the simulation to just model the force on each star coming from the galaxy's centre of mass.
I could simulate many more stars, have galaxies collide and see them spin off with their stars scattering around.
What struck me was that they looked like real galaxies we see out there.
I wasn't aware of the postulations made in the 60s/70s about there being supermassive black holes at the centre of galaxies, but to me, this simplified simulation was kind of like a smoking gun for that... from an 80286 IBM PC AT.
If we're assuming that the galaxy is radially symmetrical, doesn't it immediately follow that the combined gravitational force on a given star is the same as if we applied the force from a combined mass at the center?
This wouldn't work for something like the Solar system with a very sparse distribution of mass, but at the galaxy level it seems right even without the presence of a black hole.
Interesting. Given that the horseshoe shape is due to gravitational lensing of one far off galaxy ~19 Gly away by another "only" 6 Gly away, wouldn't that mean that any motion of those galaxies, or our galaxy, would realign the lensing and alter the shape of the horseshoe?
So... how long before we see the shape change? How fast do galaxies move anyway?
Theoretically yes but although this black hole is big enough to make that more realistic, the redirected light would be have lost so much energy we’d likely be unable to observe it. We’d need an orbital hypertelescope to even stand a chance. Even then we wouldn’t see the earth because it would be drowned out by the sun.
The bigger problem is all the dust and other stars in the way. I’m not aware of any black holes close enough that would have a direct path for the light to cross without being absorbed and scattered.
It doesn't seem like there's a limit to how big they can get just a limit to how quickly they can get bigger due to what's called the Eddington Limit which explains how matter falling into the black hole emits radiation and if enough radiation around the accretion disk builds up, it can overcome the pull of the black hole and push matter away, at least until enough matter is pushed away that the radiation levels fall back under the limit and matter starts falling in again.
Yes - but it's basically the same as the total mass of the universe.
EDIT: I believe the above could be incorrect - if the universe has too much electrical charge or angular momentum. (And some other cosmological properties, so you couldn't get around the charge & spin issues.)
Might there be a black hole astrophysicist in the house, to comment on this?
[+] [-] dweinus|7 months ago|reply
https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/26515/what-is-ex...
[+] [-] tlogan|7 months ago|reply
[+] [-] jiehong|7 months ago|reply
Passing the event horizon doesn’t mean you’ve reached the potentially ultra dense singularity, but it does mean you won’t escape.
[+] [-] pizzathyme|7 months ago|reply
The near-vacuum atmosphere of Mars seems very light...? What fundamental concept am I misunderstanding?
[+] [-] ramraj07|7 months ago|reply
[+] [-] physix|7 months ago|reply
Once we wanted to simulate the dynamics of galaxies. I don'it think it was an SA article, but we did it the slow way by calculating the force on every star individually from each other star. It was excruciatingly slow and boring.
Then some time later, I don't recall where I picked that up, I updated the simulation to just model the force on each star coming from the galaxy's centre of mass.
I could simulate many more stars, have galaxies collide and see them spin off with their stars scattering around.
What struck me was that they looked like real galaxies we see out there.
I wasn't aware of the postulations made in the 60s/70s about there being supermassive black holes at the centre of galaxies, but to me, this simplified simulation was kind of like a smoking gun for that... from an 80286 IBM PC AT.
[+] [-] ubercow13|7 months ago|reply
[+] [-] sebastiennight|7 months ago|reply
This wouldn't work for something like the Solar system with a very sparse distribution of mass, but at the galaxy level it seems right even without the presence of a black hole.
[+] [-] readthenotes1|7 months ago|reply
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmic_Horseshoe
[+] [-] tenthirtyam|7 months ago|reply
So... how long before we see the shape change? How fast do galaxies move anyway?
[+] [-] henearkr|7 months ago|reply
[+] [-] BaseBaal|7 months ago|reply
[+] [-] BSOhealth|7 months ago|reply
A cool achievement would be, observe the moon/earth separation event(s)
[+] [-] throwup238|7 months ago|reply
The bigger problem is all the dust and other stars in the way. I’m not aware of any black holes close enough that would have a direct path for the light to cross without being absorbed and scattered.
[+] [-] unknown|7 months ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] chiffre01|7 months ago|reply
[+] [-] myrmidon|7 months ago|reply
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TON_618
Event horizon radius would be about roughly 1000 times the distance between Earth/Sun.
[+] [-] ethan_smith|7 months ago|reply
[+] [-] AnimalMuppet|7 months ago|reply
[+] [-] MurkyLabs|7 months ago|reply
[+] [-] tromp|7 months ago|reply
[+] [-] jameskilton|7 months ago|reply
[+] [-] bell-cot|7 months ago|reply
EDIT: I believe the above could be incorrect - if the universe has too much electrical charge or angular momentum. (And some other cosmological properties, so you couldn't get around the charge & spin issues.)
Might there be a black hole astrophysicist in the house, to comment on this?
[+] [-] radicalbyte|7 months ago|reply
[+] [-] cft|7 months ago|reply
[+] [-] msk-lywenn|7 months ago|reply
(Sorry, I had to, with all the AI flood, I really was about to skip this info after the first 3 characters)
[+] [-] ghurtado|7 months ago|reply
[+] [-] freddier|7 months ago|reply
[+] [-] belter|7 months ago|reply
[+] [-] p1esk|7 months ago|reply
[+] [-] ozim|7 months ago|reply
Hype is strong.
[+] [-] M4R5H4LL|7 months ago|reply
[+] [-] dataflow|7 months ago|reply
[+] [-] positisop|7 months ago|reply
[+] [-] unknown|7 months ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] deafpolygon|7 months ago|reply
[+] [-] AmericanOP|7 months ago|reply