[notavalleyman]

> Of course, Meta can chose examples of actually violating posts removed and show that are counter proof, or even posts that are violating that are not yet removed

No, meta don't need to prove anything to anyone.

It's you who alleges that the content should have stayed up, so what's your evidence?

You're telling me I need to go and read a HRW pdf instead? Okay where is that?

[icw_nru]

The report: https://www.hrw.org/report/2023/12/21/metas-broken-promises/...

Unfortunately links to individual posts can't be accessed as the posts themselves are removed. The HRW report is excellent as they documented this individual cases and recorded them.

[notavalleyman]

Okay well you don't have any proof, any in general, I would consider it a good use of tax shekels to reduce the number of pro-hamas posts on social media. So until you can dig up any proof, I'm considering this whole post to be a nothing burger

[text0404]

google search for "human rights watch israel censorship" turned this up: https://www.hrw.org/sites/default/files/media_2023/12/ip_met...

check "illustrative examples" section.

[alangibson]

Wow, is almost like you're committed to obfuscation what Israel is doing. Couldn't possibly be that tho...