top | item 44876996

(no title)

ergsef | 6 months ago

There's a lot of nature to protect in Antarctica, and there are very strict rules. This guy is selfishly flaunting those rules and just paying to get rid of the consequences. Considering he's got a personal plane and pilot's license at 19 he obviously has rich parents who can buy his way out of trouble.

Donating to charity is not impressive if you're still rich after you donate. Me giving $20 to a homeless person is a bigger blow to my personal wellbeing than this guy's "donation".

discuss

order

ryandrake|6 months ago

> This guy is selfishly flaunting those rules and just paying to get rid of the consequences.

Heads up: You probably mean he is "flouting" those rules, not "flaunting." Different word.

dragonwriter|6 months ago

> This guy is selfishly flaunting those rules

“flouting” the rules actually.

Loosely:

Flaunting: ostentatiously displaying

Flouting: ostentatiously defying

scotty79|6 months ago

> There's a lot of nature to protect in Antarctica

I'm sure the entire Chilean military base with all the fuel they burn there and garbage they produce is built there specifically to protect Antarctic nature from occasional idiots in small planes.

He obviously can afford it, like the Chilean government could afford to put unnecessary military base there. Somehow when some government is stupidly splurging it's good and fine because they do it in accordance with rules, that they written themselves.

dragonwriter|6 months ago

> I'm sure the entire Chilean military base with all the fuel they burn there and garbage they produce is built there specifically to protect Antarctic nature from occasional idiots in small planes.

Its mostly there because it includes Chile’s main scientific/meteorological research station in Antarctica and the airfield providing for personnel and supply transport for both that station and the nearby stations of other countries.

llbbdd|6 months ago

Does the relative impact on the donator in some way change how much $20 is worth to the recipient?