going all-in on Linux is one thing, but going all-in on a specific window manager? with specific keybinds? idk, individual workflows are too specific to be prescribed like this imo.
I had a similar thought, but at the same time, if people were mandated to use Windows or MacOS then that would also pretty much lock you into their respective window managers. I guess it feels more restrictive partly because it's more common to pick and choose WMs on linux. (And partly because, yeah, seems like the setup goes way beyond just a distro+WM).
Also because it's a niche WM catering to pretty specific preferences. I used tiled window managers for a while but eventually I decided I preferred the no-customization, one-size-fits-all Gnome/KDE experience. A hyperland config is going to fit like a tailor-made gloveābut in this case, it's a glove tailor-made for your CEO, not you.
I spun up Omarchy in a VM just to see what the fuss was about, and when I opened Neovim it booted into a plugin manager and started installing at least two dozen random plugins, including an extremely over-eager autocomplete config that filled my screen with snippet suggestions. I was instantly irritated.
Actually Omarchy is also run by 37 signals so this post is effectively that them saying that they're going all in on the same stack as a group. They can obviously just change what that stack is whenever they want though. This is coming from the inventor of rails so it's not that surprising to see a push for conventions.
dimatura|6 months ago
bccdee|6 months ago
I spun up Omarchy in a VM just to see what the fuss was about, and when I opened Neovim it booted into a plugin manager and started installing at least two dozen random plugins, including an extremely over-eager autocomplete config that filled my screen with snippet suggestions. I was instantly irritated.
adverbly|6 months ago
mkozlows|6 months ago
j3s|6 months ago
hactually|6 months ago
do_not_redeem|6 months ago