top | item 44900501 (no title) rdlw | 6 months ago That's the systemd article, and this is the forum post explaining why arch moved to systemd: https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=1149530#p1149530 discuss order hn newest pkulak|6 months ago https://archive.is/Mi9DPScroll down to the long post by tomegun.I kinda get the animosity now. I wasn't really using Linux at the time, but if I was, and my system was running great, and then I had a list of complicated instructions I had to perform to change my init system... I'd probably be peeved off. Ferret7446|6 months ago Then you should not use Arch. Manual invention is normal and in line with Arch's philosophy of making things simpler for the maintainers. load replies (1)
pkulak|6 months ago https://archive.is/Mi9DPScroll down to the long post by tomegun.I kinda get the animosity now. I wasn't really using Linux at the time, but if I was, and my system was running great, and then I had a list of complicated instructions I had to perform to change my init system... I'd probably be peeved off. Ferret7446|6 months ago Then you should not use Arch. Manual invention is normal and in line with Arch's philosophy of making things simpler for the maintainers. load replies (1)
Ferret7446|6 months ago Then you should not use Arch. Manual invention is normal and in line with Arch's philosophy of making things simpler for the maintainers. load replies (1)
pkulak|6 months ago
Scroll down to the long post by tomegun.
I kinda get the animosity now. I wasn't really using Linux at the time, but if I was, and my system was running great, and then I had a list of complicated instructions I had to perform to change my init system... I'd probably be peeved off.
Ferret7446|6 months ago