[waterhouse]

Looks to be (1269 words into the article according to wc):

> [Parker and Stone]’s lawyer, Kevin Morris, insisted that any South Park revenue not derived specifically from broadcast on the cable channel would go into the pot for calculating the men’s share of back-end profits.

Though that might be a precursor to enabling this (400 words later):

> With negotiating leverage, Parker and Stone agreed to a 4-year $75 million deal and, separately, a 50/50 cut of advertising revenue for any digital property…in perpetuity.

[quietbritishjim]

And that second quote is taken from the cited New York Times article which is the real source

https://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/27/business/media/27south.ht...