(no title)
timoth3y | 6 months ago
The author's (along with "many philosophers'") entire line of argument is argument from analogy. She lists many aspects of corporations that are similar to aspects possessed by humans and then conclude they are the same thing.
The same argument could be made with humans and ducks and it would be just as valid.
The author's view that corporations are actually people is becoming more common not because it is rational, but because it is profitable for corporations to be able to claim various kinds of personal rights.
No comments yet.