(no title)
mrDmrTmrJ | 6 months ago
While I'd love to see more nuclear reactors in our society. The "nuclear everything" argument breaks a core tenant of US national security policy, making U235 very hard to get.
mrDmrTmrJ | 6 months ago
While I'd love to see more nuclear reactors in our society. The "nuclear everything" argument breaks a core tenant of US national security policy, making U235 very hard to get.
thephyber|6 months ago
It was extremely clear to me that it was a comment to show the stupidity of the admin insisting that energy density was the right/only heuristic for evaluating which fuel sources to use/support.
jijijijij|6 months ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic_battery
Proper reactors are impractical scaled down, as far as I know. Inside a large submarine or aircraft carrier is probably the smallest practical scale for a reactor and I bet there is a ton of trade-offs.
dragonwriter|6 months ago
The rover ones use Pu-238.
> You know, the Mars rover‘s pictures are censored in some areas… that’s where the radioisotope batteries are located.
The Curiosity and Perserverance rovers each have one MMRTG (multimission radiothermal generator), and I've never seen a picture of the rover where it is censored, and its actually explicitly called out and shown and drawn attention to in lots of NASA publicity stuff.
https://share.google/cqF7eqAJtLH52ALtN
https://mars.nasa.gov/internal_resources/788/
DoctorOetker|6 months ago
mrbluecoat|6 months ago
MertsA|6 months ago
AnthonyMouse|6 months ago