top | item 44944112

(no title)

rlue | 6 months ago

It technically doesn't say "self-contained", but it does say "portable" and "self-updating", which I must agree is misleading.

discuss

outofpaper|6 months ago

If you want something actually self contained play with this https://startr.style/modernism/

actinium226|6 months ago

This thing comes across so pretentiously, but they have some really novel CSS ideas I might try. The idea of making selector based on [style*="--bgc:"] and using that to set background color like style="--bgc: red" is not something that I would have thought of.

abustamam|6 months ago

That was cool! Thanks for sharing.

myfonj|6 months ago

In my perspective, for truly "self-contained", "portable" and "self-updating" and even "un-hosted" web apps, the only option nowadays are prehistoric data-URIs, that are slowly losing abilities anyway (basically can live only as bookmarks or direct URL pastes, and their only persistence option is location #hash that needs re-bookmarking):

    data:text/html;charset=utf-8,<body id=b onload=b.innerHTML=decodeURIComponent((l=location).hash.slice(1)) onkeyup=document.title=b.innerText.split('\n')[0]||'.' onblur=try{history.pushState({},document.title,'\u0023'+b.innerHTML)}catch(e){l.hash=b.innerHTML} contenteditable bgcolor=darkslategray text=snow link=aqua vlink=lime style=text-align:center>#Hello, HN!<br><br>Do you like this %E2%9D%9Dun-hosted%E2%9D%9E&nbsp;app?<br>With persistence<a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/reply?id=44944112">%E2%80%A6?</a>