[mkeeter]

The LLM tics are strong in this writeup:

"No manual overrides, no exceptions."

"Our VDP isn't just a bug bounty—it's a security partnership"

[oasisbob]

Wow, you hit a nerve with that one. There have been some quick edits on the page.

Another:

> Security isn't just a checkbox for us; it's fundamental to our mission.

[observationist]

They delved deep and spent a whole 2 minutes with ChatGPT 4o getting those explanations and apologies in play.

[jjani]

Hey CodeRabbit employees

> The researchers identified that Rubocop, one of our tools, was running outside our secure sandbox environment — a configuration that deviated from our standard security protocols.

This is still ultra-LLM-speak (and no, not just because of the em-dash).

[rob74]

A few years ago such phrases would have been candidates for a game of bullshit bingo, now all the BS has been ingested by LLMs and is being regurgitated upon us in purified form...

[teaearlgraycold]

Absolutely. In my experience every AI startup is full of AI maximalists. They use AI for everything they can - in part because they believe in the hype, in part to keep up to date with model capabilities. They would absolutely go so far as to write such an important piece of text using an LLM.

[coldpie]

The NFT smell completely permeates the AI "industry." Can't wait for this bubble to pop.