top | item 44957064

(no title)

noinsight | 6 months ago

You can just use Unbound for DNS.

discuss

order

1vuio0pswjnm7|6 months ago

From https://github.com/NLnetLabs/unbound/issues/132

"Some users of our service (NextDNS), discovered this issue since edgekey.net has been added to some anti-tracker blocklists, resulting in the blocking of large sites like apple.com, airbnb.com, ebay.com when used with unbound."

As Pi-Hole is a modified dnsmasq, NextDNS may be a modified unbound

1vuio0pswjnm7|6 months ago

I use tinydns or nsd

You can use unbound

I do not use a cache

For HTTP I use a localhost-bound TLS forward proxy that has the DNS data in memory; I gather the DNS data in bulk from various sources using various methods; there are no remote DNS queries when I make HTTP requests

Unbound is overkill for how I use DNS on the local network

throw0101c|6 months ago

Unbound is a recursive-only resolver. NSD is an authoritative-only resolver.

Those are different use cases.