[rhodey]

What the license allows for is very clear

I publish many things without dual licensing and yet your kind will not be satisfied

[craftkiller]

This isn't about demanding you let companies use your code. This is about what you are calling that license. It is not the MIT license and it is wrong to lie to people by calling it the MIT license. You should give it a name like "The bizcards license" or whatever.

IANAL but you also might want to consult a lawyer since your franken-license contradicts itself. It might be hard to challenge a company in court when they steal your code.

[cAtte_]

if it forbids commercial use, it's not MIT. like at all

[rhodey]

This is simple I wrote a license The license says there are two licenses If you are non-commercial you get MIT If you are commercial you email for terms

There is nowhere a claim that this is MIT