[hobo_in_library]

To be fair, their concern tends to be a more consistent "Don't push these corrupting agents towards me or my society"

If the school curriculum aligned with their belief system, they won't be talking about a need for control

[solid_fuel]

Except “corrupting” in this case often just means “LGBTQ”. In exactly the same way “corrupting influence” used to mean “music made by black people” or “anything pro-worker”.

Corrupting ideas don’t exist. There is truly no such thing as an infohazard. We, as humans, are capable of making up our own minds about things and we don’t need to give this power of censorship over to people who are not acting in good faith.

[LexiMax]

I've been convinced for a while that the religious angle against queer folk is just a front.

Instead of honest religious conviction, I think the pearl clutching is the manifestation of the collective paranoia of weak men who are terrified that other men are looking at them the same way they look at women.

[Aurornis]

> If the school curriculum aligned with their belief system, they won't be talking about a need for control

No they wouldn’t. They don’t want anyone accessing materials they disagree with. Having such materials available on the internet feels like a threat to themselves and their children. They don’t care about collateral damage, they just want more control.

[Loughla]

If they had control of the school they wouldn't be talking about needing control of the school?

[susiecambria]

Well, they would be talking about maintaining control. Control requires constant vigilance to reinforce compliance coupled with making sure there is no disobedience. The latter speaks to "needing control."

Does this make any sense or am I full of hot air?

[elteto]

Just yield and do as they say, and they’ll maybe spare you.