(no title)
edge17
|
6 months ago
...thats how the US Constitution works. Congress passes laws (CHIPS Act) and the executive branch is empowered to carry them out - in this case the Secretary of Commerce and Commerce Dept. One can argue whether it stretches the intent of the law, nothing wrong with debate. But as of now, I don't think any judge or court has contested in the interpretation of the language.
cududa|6 months ago
edge17|6 months ago
One can argue how to interpret "financial assistance" broadly, which is exactly what the administration has done.
JumpCrisscross|6 months ago
Who has standing to sue here? The best I could see is a shareholder lawsuit, but that will take years. Meanwhile, this administration is getting slapped down by courts across the country, including a SCOTUS willing to overturn precedent to curry his favour.
georgeecollins|6 months ago