[snickerdoodle12]

how does this compare with frigate?

[diggan]

User of Frigate here. Seems these are some pretty major differences of what you can do for free with Frigate, but if you use Clearcam, you need to pay for "Clearcam Premium":

- View your live camera feeds remotely.

- Receive notifications on events (objects/people detected).

- View event clips remotely.

- End-to-end encryption on all data.

What neither of the solutions seem to have, is encryption at rest. But I guess others, just like me, rather encrypt the volume/storage itself, instead of leaving it up to applications anyways, so might/might not matter for you.

[baruz]

The author states elsewhere that the payments are for the use of their server, which can be reconfigured.

[roryclear]

fewer features, easier setup, with more GPUs supported. (I've not used frigate myself though, only watched videos)

[diggan]

Where can I find the list of supported GPUs? Frigate been able to handle everything I've tried so far, all from Nvidia and AMD GPUs to even Intel iGPUs.

[pimlottc]

Sorry, which one are you talking about, frigate or clear cam?

[sugarpimpdorsey]

it's AGPL so you have to give anyone that views your camera feeds a copy of the source

[skinkestek]

Unless you’re making changes, isn’t it enough to just link back to the original repo?

That said, I’ve also been in the camp that avoids AGPL-except maybe as a way to sell a commercial license while still being "open source," or just to be obnoxious. And honestly, I am still failing to see the upside in being obnoxious for its own sake.