[cure]

> If solar was viable, it would not require forcing tax payers to fund these businesses.

This is not true. Solar and wind are already cheaper than fossil fuel generation for new capacity. Source: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/wind-and-solar-en...

[dimitrios1]

So then removing the subsidies shouldn't be an issue?

[MyOutfitIsVague]

It's not just subsidies, it's also permitting and any other roadblocks they can manage. This isn't just economic or political, it's a weird personal crusade.

[Sayrus]

If it was only the subsidies, but it's not.

https://www.reuters.com/legal/litigation/us-orders-orsted-ha...

[JumpCrisscross]

It shouldn’t. Trump is using environmental regulation to block projects. It’s crazy seeing the GOP embrace San Francisco’s last decade of policy.