The more we avoid terms, the more negative their connotations become, and the more we forget about history.
I would argue, without any evidence, that when terms are used and embraced, they lose their negative connotations. Because in the end, you want to fight the negativity they represent, not the term itself.
Allow/deny list is more descriptive. That's one good reason for using those terms. Do you agree?
In reply to your argument, the deny list (the actual list, apart from what term we use for it) is necessarily something negatively laden, since the items denied are denied due to the real risks/costs they otherwise impose. So using and embracing the less direct phrase 'black' rather than 'deny' in this case seems unlikely to reduce negative connotations from the phrase 'black'.
McDyver|6 months ago
I would argue, without any evidence, that when terms are used and embraced, they lose their negative connotations. Because in the end, you want to fight the negativity they represent, not the term itself.
zipliners|6 months ago
In reply to your argument, the deny list (the actual list, apart from what term we use for it) is necessarily something negatively laden, since the items denied are denied due to the real risks/costs they otherwise impose. So using and embracing the less direct phrase 'black' rather than 'deny' in this case seems unlikely to reduce negative connotations from the phrase 'black'.
test6554|6 months ago
And then decide whoever used them had malicious intent?
McDyver|6 months ago
zipliners|6 months ago
dokyun|6 months ago
plaguna|6 months ago
valvix|6 months ago
[deleted]
plaguna|6 months ago
[deleted]
anonfordays|6 months ago
[deleted]
plaguna|6 months ago
[deleted]