top | item 45015194

(no title)

fooofw | 6 months ago

For reference, here's a version with a linear y-axis: https://imgur.com/a/A2D1puk

discuss

order

qualeed|6 months ago

For the purposes of this article, this graph is much more effective at making the point than the log scale one. I think it would have been a better choice to use a graph like this.

Thanks!

ginko|6 months ago

But you can barely tell the growth of sumatrapdf in the non-logarithmic chart. Same for Adobe Reader before 2000 or so.

bigstrat2003|6 months ago

Thank you! That graph is so much clearer than the one in the article. You can see at a glance the relative size of the two programs, which the logarithmic scale does a terrible job showing.

Night_Thastus|6 months ago

This makes way more sense if the point was to show how big and bloated Adobe Reader has gotten, and by comparison just how space-efficient Sumatra is.

Way more representative.