top | item 45015638 (no title) flavio81 | 6 months ago >No multithreading, I/O locks under GNUs/eww, glacial slowAll this would not happen if RMS had chosen Common Lisp to implement it... discuss order hn newest anthk|6 months ago RMS hates Common Lisp because it's a bit bloated (tons) and the closes to GNU Emacs written in CL it's Lem and it feels far slower than Emacs. kazinator|6 months ago Ironically, the GNU system now needs hundreds of megabytes of installation just to compile C. load replies (1) Karrot_Kream|6 months ago Bloated? Sure. But slower than emacs? Strong disagreement here.I find Lem a lot snappier than emacs. load replies (1)
anthk|6 months ago RMS hates Common Lisp because it's a bit bloated (tons) and the closes to GNU Emacs written in CL it's Lem and it feels far slower than Emacs. kazinator|6 months ago Ironically, the GNU system now needs hundreds of megabytes of installation just to compile C. load replies (1) Karrot_Kream|6 months ago Bloated? Sure. But slower than emacs? Strong disagreement here.I find Lem a lot snappier than emacs. load replies (1)
kazinator|6 months ago Ironically, the GNU system now needs hundreds of megabytes of installation just to compile C. load replies (1)
Karrot_Kream|6 months ago Bloated? Sure. But slower than emacs? Strong disagreement here.I find Lem a lot snappier than emacs. load replies (1)
anthk|6 months ago
kazinator|6 months ago
Karrot_Kream|6 months ago
I find Lem a lot snappier than emacs.