[lutzh]

I'm sure rv is great, but am I the only one who needs one such tool not only for Ruby, but also Python, JavaScript, and Java, at least, and finds it weird to run 4+ of those?

I put my hope in mise-en-place - https://mise.jdx.dev

What do people think? One tool per language, or one to rule them all?

[cjk]

We've been using mise since it was called rtx at $DAYJOB, and it's caused many a headache (mostly around upgrades/backcompat/etc.). We use it both on dev machines and in CI. In spite of that, it’s decent at what it does, and I wouldn’t soon replace it with individual version managers, given that we have similar needs.

However…more than once we've seen language runtimes that used to be available exclusively via plug-ins be migrated to be internal to mise, which broke everyone's setups in strange and hilarious ways, and caused countless hours of debugging.

Less bad overall than using individual runtime version managers for sure. But the next time mise costs us a bunch of hours fixing multiple engineers' setups, I intend to find another solution, even if that means writing my own. It’s burned us nearly one too many times.

[paffdragon]

Do you have any examples what tends to break? We used pyenv/rbenv/sdkman etc. individually, then moved to asdf and now arrived at mise. Not using yet for CI just developer stuff and so far didn't have issues. But this is quite recent for us, so didn't have to deal with upgrade issues yet.

[tracker1]

I think it's probably for the best to have a different tool for each language/platform. Not every language or platform matches feature for feature in that the options will already be different for each language, and you're likely to have such a "universal" tool come up short in support of one language or another.

I really appreciate cargo a lot for what it brings, even if it's calling different tools under the covers. Similarly, I appreciate deno in that it brings all the tooling and the runtime in a single executable (box). I've migrated most of my scripting to TypeScript using deno at this point because of that distributive ease. Even if the shebang itself is a bit sloppy.

Aside, would be cool to have a VS Code extension that would to file type detection based on a shebang at the top of the file. Making it easier to do extensionless script files with language support.

[andriamanitra]

In theory it would be nice to have one tool for all languages but I think it's never going to be practical because programming languages can be different in arbitrary ways. I can't imagine how the same tool could ever be ergonomic for managing projects written in C++, Scheme, Haskell and Bash for example. Mise (and other tools for managing development environments like Flox and asdf – I prefer Flox myself) only implement a subset of the features of languages specific tools like cargo/uv/rv. For example cargo can do all of this out of the box (and you can also extend it with more subcommands):

* manage dependencies

* format and lint code

* publish package on crates.io

* open the project documentation

* install binaries

* build/run the project

* run tests

* run benchmarks

Uv/rv don't (yet?) do all of that but they also manage Ruby/Python versions (which is done separately by rustup in Rust).

[jaynetics]

I'm a happy long-term user of asdf. https://github.com/asdf-vm/asdf

[yxhuvud]

The real selling point of mise imo is that it handles more than just languages - including automatic postgres setup in your dependencies is great)