[AftHurrahWinch]

As usual, the facts are in the linked report not in the journalist's summary.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1nrMSJOxI6Iqw6HRKtnvWjOkj3tp...

It's more precise, avoiding that strange construction, "science-based". If I understand correctly, linguists call these productive analogies (?), where we start producing more of them by analogy to some root, so:

Faith-based -> Community-based -> Evidence-based -> Plant-based -> Science-based

Or some other hypothetical inheritance chain.