top | item 45047252 (no title) hdra | 6 months ago is that because of a regulation?coz where I live there is no such regulation, but banks still checks for root because of the support load concern discuss order hn newest NewJazz|6 months ago There's a difference between checking for root and checking for non default operating systems. 2rsf|6 months ago I suppose the regulation will not mention "rooted devices" but will talk about the bank's obligation for risks and mitigations Jensson|6 months ago Yeah, as long as banks are held liable for you getting hacked they will want to check the integrity of your system in their programs.And you don't want a world where banks are not liable for such things, they have to be or they wouldn't spend any resources on their systems.
NewJazz|6 months ago There's a difference between checking for root and checking for non default operating systems.
2rsf|6 months ago I suppose the regulation will not mention "rooted devices" but will talk about the bank's obligation for risks and mitigations Jensson|6 months ago Yeah, as long as banks are held liable for you getting hacked they will want to check the integrity of your system in their programs.And you don't want a world where banks are not liable for such things, they have to be or they wouldn't spend any resources on their systems.
Jensson|6 months ago Yeah, as long as banks are held liable for you getting hacked they will want to check the integrity of your system in their programs.And you don't want a world where banks are not liable for such things, they have to be or they wouldn't spend any resources on their systems.
NewJazz|6 months ago
2rsf|6 months ago
Jensson|6 months ago
And you don't want a world where banks are not liable for such things, they have to be or they wouldn't spend any resources on their systems.