top | item 45058884

(no title)

cntainer | 6 months ago

I can't remember the last time I saw a slide as mangled as the one in the article. It hurts my brain just reading it.

But you are right, most engineers would consider that reasonable, while complaining about the "muggles" that just don't get it.

As a Software Architect, one of my main responsibilities has been to take information presented like above and turn it into something that non-technical people can digest.

Being able to express a complex concept in simple terms is an invaluable skill.

discuss

order

wat10000|6 months ago

It's really terrible. It's basically:

> Everything is fine.

> Stuff is good.

> There's no problem.

> It's all going great.

> Actually, everyone on board is likely to die.

hinkley|6 months ago

Someone didn’t learn about anchoring in business 101.

poulpy123|6 months ago

Actually most engineers would complain about the slides shown here. The issue is not the technicality or depth of the content but on the way it is presented and shown. I'm

cntainer|6 months ago

it depends, I noticed that many engineers will input information on a slide following their thought process closely, they rarely think about the audience's perspective, especially if the audience is less technical or not familiar with the domain.

gjejcjekdnfnwja|6 months ago

We're talking about something a lot more technically sophisticated than a B2B SAAS CRUD web app. PhD level education is considered a prerequisite.

cntainer|6 months ago

Sure mate, because taking a messy list of confusing statements and turning it into something like: "High risk of failure on re-entry - foam strike more than 600 times bigger than test data - test data unfit to support decision as flight condition is significantly outside of test database" requires a PhD in Materials Science.

If you can't effectively communicate how the results (or lack of results) of your research will impact the outcome of a high-stakes space mission you have no business being in that room from the start.

poulpy123|6 months ago

No PhD I know (several hundreds, in physics) would ever consider this slide remotely acceptable

scrlk|6 months ago

Isn't this a stronger argument for making sure that things are communicated clearly?

hinkley|6 months ago

PhD in what though?