(no title)
oddmade | 6 months ago
Already got close to cancel when they recently updated their TOS to say that for "consumers" they deserve the right to own the output I paid for - if they deem the output not having been used "the correct way" !
This adds substantial risk to any startup.
Obviously...for "commercial" customers that do not apply - at 5x the cost...
brutal_chaos_|6 months ago
In the US, at least, the works generated by "AI" are not copyrightable. So for my layman's understanding, they may claim ownership, but it means nothing wrt copyright.
(though patents, trademarks are another story that I am unfamiliar with)
shikon7|6 months ago
So you cannot stop them from using the code AI generated for you, based on copyright claims.
unknown|6 months ago
[deleted]
tbrownaw|6 months ago
I wonder if any appropriate-specialty lawyers have written publicly about those AI agents that can supposedly turn a bug report or enhancement request into a PR...
aeon_ai|6 months ago
oddmade|6 months ago
"Subject to your compliance with our Terms, we assign to you all our right, title, and interest (if any) in Outputs."
..and if you read the terms you find a very long list of what they deem acceptable.
I see now they also added "Non-commercial use only. You agree not to use our Services for any commercial or business purposes" ...
..so paying 100usd a month for a code assistant is now a hobby ?
nojito|6 months ago
If you're a startup are you not a "commercial" customer?
oddmade|6 months ago
eru|6 months ago
sitkack|6 months ago