[msgodel]

Regardless dealing with this would be a luxury. The rest of the economy has to function first and then we can talk about this. If you intentionally sabotage the country with these ideas it doesn't even matter if you're right, the public will tear down the institutions you use to do it.

[quantified]

So far that's not been a problem.

[JohnFen]

> Regardless dealing with this would be a luxury.

Dealing with this is a matter of survival. It's not a luxury.

[jaggs]

'Intentionally sabotage' a country by preparing for climate catastrophe is such a cute way of phrasing things. :)

What part of rising seas, lost coastlines, destroyed harvests and massive flooding and fires don't you folks understand? :)

[rsynnott]

I mean, look, there's one recent thing that looks to an outsider an awful lot like intentional sabotage of the US economy, and it's not energy-related...