top | item 45109067 (no title) xyzzy9563 | 6 months ago Why should shareholders have to suffer just because the Google engineers were good at their job? discuss order hn newest stackskipton|6 months ago The verdict makes it's clear that Google got to its position via anti competitive practices which are illegal.However, for whatever reason, the judge decided that penalty was basically slap on the wrist and finger wagging. xyzzy9563|6 months ago Everyone is free to make their own search engine. The consumers choose Google time and time again. load replies (1) solardev|6 months ago Because the overall well-being of a society is supposedly more important than a few shareholders' wealth? Workaccount2|6 months ago Probably about 60% of Americans are Google shareholders.Not saying we should favor share price over all else, but far more than a few wealthy shareholders will be the benefactors of this. load replies (1) xyzzy9563|6 months ago Do you know of any societies in the world that have a high quality of life but don’t have wealthy shareholders? load replies (2) GuinansEyebrows|6 months ago bluntly, because incentives for investors to benefit from anticompetitive practices should be removed, in order to deter those anticompetitive practices. regulation works when you let it. unknown|6 months ago [deleted]
stackskipton|6 months ago The verdict makes it's clear that Google got to its position via anti competitive practices which are illegal.However, for whatever reason, the judge decided that penalty was basically slap on the wrist and finger wagging. xyzzy9563|6 months ago Everyone is free to make their own search engine. The consumers choose Google time and time again. load replies (1)
xyzzy9563|6 months ago Everyone is free to make their own search engine. The consumers choose Google time and time again. load replies (1)
solardev|6 months ago Because the overall well-being of a society is supposedly more important than a few shareholders' wealth? Workaccount2|6 months ago Probably about 60% of Americans are Google shareholders.Not saying we should favor share price over all else, but far more than a few wealthy shareholders will be the benefactors of this. load replies (1) xyzzy9563|6 months ago Do you know of any societies in the world that have a high quality of life but don’t have wealthy shareholders? load replies (2)
Workaccount2|6 months ago Probably about 60% of Americans are Google shareholders.Not saying we should favor share price over all else, but far more than a few wealthy shareholders will be the benefactors of this. load replies (1)
xyzzy9563|6 months ago Do you know of any societies in the world that have a high quality of life but don’t have wealthy shareholders? load replies (2)
GuinansEyebrows|6 months ago bluntly, because incentives for investors to benefit from anticompetitive practices should be removed, in order to deter those anticompetitive practices. regulation works when you let it.
stackskipton|6 months ago
However, for whatever reason, the judge decided that penalty was basically slap on the wrist and finger wagging.
xyzzy9563|6 months ago
solardev|6 months ago
Workaccount2|6 months ago
Not saying we should favor share price over all else, but far more than a few wealthy shareholders will be the benefactors of this.
xyzzy9563|6 months ago
GuinansEyebrows|6 months ago
unknown|6 months ago
[deleted]