Well, offhand, no one buys a cloud server for power efficiency, people buy into the cloud for reliability, or performance, or cost -- or some combination thereof.
If you're buying ultra-power, you're forgoing power-efficiency.
> no one buys a cloud server for power efficiency, people buy into the cloud for reliability, or performance, or cost -- or some combination thereof
Low cost and power efficiency are pretty much the same thing for a datacenter though, since cooling is the most expensive part. Hence e.g. AWS pushing Graviton.
A single cloud server could host hundreds of thousands of personal static websites though. I suspect they probably do use less power than 100,000 old phones.
chneu|6 months ago
bb88|6 months ago
If you're buying ultra-power, you're forgoing power-efficiency.
lmm|6 months ago
Low cost and power efficiency are pretty much the same thing for a datacenter though, since cooling is the most expensive part. Hence e.g. AWS pushing Graviton.
SchemaLoad|6 months ago
BLKNSLVR|6 months ago
pharrington|6 months ago