(no title)
slightlyoff | 6 months ago
Instead, they come from open, honest, iterative design (when done well), and shipping ahead of others is risky, but that's why we designed the Blink Launch Process to demand so much pre-work (specs, tests, origin trials, good faith attempts to include other vendors in design, etc.) in order to launch that way.
Some background on these points here:
https://infrequently.org/series/effective-standards-work/
https://youtu.be/1Z83L6xa1tw?si=939PBH4_idtZGI6Y
As to, "should Apple follow Chromium's lead", perhaps ask "how would that be different than today?"
See:
https://infrequently.org/2023/02/safari-16-4-is-an-admission...
And:
https://infrequently.org/2025/06/the-ghost-of-christmas-past...
wtallis|6 months ago
You say that shipping ahead of others is risky, but can't seem to acknowledge when the negative outcome comes to pass and other browser vendors aren't interested in adopting questionable feature proposals.
slightlyoff|6 months ago
The downsides to this are not lost on me. Why do you think I'm making an issue of it publicly now? We tried literally everything else. This is last resort stuff. The goal is always more collaboration, and through it, better, better-funded, and more capable browsers. Apple is the unique obstacle to all of that today.