(no title)
noobly | 5 months ago
I do wish they’d improve the PDF usability or embrace open sourcing the UI. There’s a lot of features that should be easy to implement, like split screen or floating sticky notes, but they seem almost wholly focused on the hardware. I thought it’d be the ultimate tool for studying math and saving money on books, thus paying for itself, but it’s just not there yet and I’m not sure they plan to get it there.
ryukoposting|5 months ago
nicbou|5 months ago
My reasons: much better software for sketching, not bound to a single ereader app, multiple ways to send stuff around, perfect size.
Many years later, I would still choose the same. I use it to annotate webpages, sketch, read books and read queued articles in instapaper. It's distraction-free but still connected. I can Airdrop drawings or load my handwritten notes on the Macbook app. Tap to define is so good I've absent-mindedly tried it on a paper book.
The LED screen is great for some things and bad for others. You have to turn it on and unlock it. You can't SSH into it or sync your drawings as simple files. Otherwise, it's really good.
dotancohen|5 months ago
It will run most Android apps (modulo Eink screen support). The built-in note taking app is terrific.
roumenguha|5 months ago
rjsw|5 months ago
nunez|5 months ago
kitchi|5 months ago
_Algernon_|5 months ago
freilanzer|5 months ago
That's exactly the use case though. It's a replacement for pen and paper, and the lack of functionality is seen as a feature.