top | item 45131399 (no title) bpev | 5 months ago Probably simplicity. In my experience, SM2 has less levers, and is easier to implement initially. discuss order hn newest jarrett-ye|5 months ago SM2 has less parameters, but there is not a systematic way to tweak them correctly. With the optimizer, it's easy to make FSRS adaptive to any learners. There is only one lever for user to tweak in FSRS: the desired retention.
jarrett-ye|5 months ago SM2 has less parameters, but there is not a systematic way to tweak them correctly. With the optimizer, it's easy to make FSRS adaptive to any learners. There is only one lever for user to tweak in FSRS: the desired retention.
jarrett-ye|5 months ago