top | item 45137371 (no title) arpinum | 5 months ago The EU did put in regulations, but they did the opposite and essentially mandated DRM. They want to prevent owners from turning off nanny devices or overriding pollution controls. discuss order hn newest FirmwareBurner|5 months ago Can you share what car repairability regulations did the EU put into place? Because following the posts of EV Clinic it seems like the opposite. mort96|5 months ago I don't think there's disagreement here:> The EU did put in regulations, but they did the opposite and essentially mandated DRMis the same statement as:> following the posts of EV Clinic it seems like [the EU did] the oppositeWhere both posts use "the opposite" to mean "the opposite of creating in regulations to enforce repairability" .
FirmwareBurner|5 months ago Can you share what car repairability regulations did the EU put into place? Because following the posts of EV Clinic it seems like the opposite. mort96|5 months ago I don't think there's disagreement here:> The EU did put in regulations, but they did the opposite and essentially mandated DRMis the same statement as:> following the posts of EV Clinic it seems like [the EU did] the oppositeWhere both posts use "the opposite" to mean "the opposite of creating in regulations to enforce repairability" .
mort96|5 months ago I don't think there's disagreement here:> The EU did put in regulations, but they did the opposite and essentially mandated DRMis the same statement as:> following the posts of EV Clinic it seems like [the EU did] the oppositeWhere both posts use "the opposite" to mean "the opposite of creating in regulations to enforce repairability" .
FirmwareBurner|5 months ago
mort96|5 months ago
> The EU did put in regulations, but they did the opposite and essentially mandated DRM
is the same statement as:
> following the posts of EV Clinic it seems like [the EU did] the opposite
Where both posts use "the opposite" to mean "the opposite of creating in regulations to enforce repairability" .