(no title)
rthnbgrredf | 5 months ago
Graphics cards with decent amount of memory are still massively overpriced (even used), big, noisy and draw a lot of energy.
rthnbgrredf | 5 months ago
Graphics cards with decent amount of memory are still massively overpriced (even used), big, noisy and draw a lot of energy.
Aurornis|5 months ago
I would recommend sticking to macOS if compatibility and performance are the goal.
Asahi is an amazing accomplishment, but running native optimized macOS software including MLX acceleration is the way to go unless you’re dead-set on using Linux and willing to deal with the tradeoffs.
ivape|5 months ago
Apple really is #2 and probably could be #1 in AI consumer hardware.
jeroenhd|5 months ago
I'd try the whole AI thing on my work Macbook but Apple's built-in AI stuff isn't available in my language, so perhaps that's also why I haven't heard anybody mention it.
benreesman|5 months ago
seanmcdirmid|5 months ago
wkat4242|5 months ago
jibbers|5 months ago
nullsmack|5 months ago
benreesman|5 months ago
Depends on what you're doing, but at FP4 that goes pretty far.
giancarlostoro|5 months ago
mrbonner|5 months ago
croes|5 months ago
evilduck|5 months ago
Seems like at the consumer hardware level you just have to pick your poison or what one factor you care about most. Macs with a Max or Ultra chip can have good memory bandwidth but low compute, but also ultra low power consumption. Discrete GPUs have great compute and bandwidth but low to middling VRAM, and high costs and power consumption. The unified memory PCs like the Ryzen AI Max and the Nvidia DGX deliver middling compute, higher VRAMs, and terrible memory bandwidth.
ekianjo|5 months ago