(no title)
_Algernon_ | 5 months ago
Copying a thing or accessing a platform = the previous owner can still use or sell it.
Even if you consider it unethical access, the comparison to stealing really misses the mark.
_Algernon_ | 5 months ago
Copying a thing or accessing a platform = the previous owner can still use or sell it.
Even if you consider it unethical access, the comparison to stealing really misses the mark.
jpadkins|5 months ago
ehnto|5 months ago
It would be amorale if these services were not exploiting everyone they can, including the creators.
The better analogy would be, is it okay to walk out on a barber who is spying on your phone, coughing in your face, and won't stop trying to convince you to buy his buddies shampoo or vote for their political party.
snapcaster|5 months ago
fragilerock|5 months ago
philipallstar|5 months ago
I know this always triggers a hard-coded response based on regex, but the comparison doesn't rely on the specifics of stealing, so it's not a valid criticism. The logic is: people offer things in exchange for a price. You can take the things in exchange for the price, or you can leave the things. You shouldn't take the things without paying the price.
gessha|5 months ago
snapcaster|5 months ago